Skip to main content

The Challenge of Making Homes More Accessible (#UDS5)

I didn't return to St. Louis for the 5th Universal Design Summit (#UDS5) this year, but following along from a distance has been great - the increased use of social media since 2010 has made that much easier. I'll use this occasion to share a few of my thoughts on creating more housing that meets UD goals with you.  First, some UD 101 for those who are unfamiliar: In housing, universal design's goal is to make homes more accessible to all people who might use the home, making special design or adaptations unnecessary if someone living in or visiting the home has physical difficulties or disabilities. (See the AARP Public Policy Institute Fact Sheet on UD for more)

The picture to the left represents one of the simplest examples of universal design - an outlet at a reachable height that passes the "hammer test."

If you look around the internet for advice on how high to place an outlet from the floor, you'll see several  recommendations to use the traditional method - placing the outlet box one hammer's height from the floor. This outlet in my office is higher than my trusty hammer, making it easier to reach from a seated position. This simple step has made it  easier to use for me, and if the next person to use this office uses a wheelchair, she would be able to reach it without much trouble. Similarly, light switches can be placed at a reachable height, doorways can be constructed with a 32" wide clear opening, bathrooms and kitchens can be built with enough space (60" diameter) to provide a turning radius for someone who would be in a wheelchair or use another device, and  entrances can be built that don't require steps.


Most commercial buildings and multifamily housing (e.g. apartments) have federal requirements that require builders to meet some of these types of standards (including those created by the ADA and Fair Housing Act) but there are no such requirements for single family homes. Note that none of these features are "hospital-like" or require that a building be outfitted in ways that are visibly focused on physical disability. One of the goals of advocates is to expand the number of homes that are built with universal design features, but that requires several strategies:


Above are three categories that are used to increase the availability of these features:  Mandates have been used in several states: for example, Vermont requires that homes that are "built without a known owner" have Visitability features in place - these are a subset of features that are designed to allow people to visit any home.  In other places, this is only required of buildings built with government funding assistance - including subsidized housing, government loans, etc.

Voluntary Incentives are the favorite of the building community, and are often easier to get into place.  These vary from tax incentives for building homes with improved access to designation programs that put a "stamp of approval" on homes that meet a certain threshold. Receiving permits faster if your company builds homes with better design is an incentive that has little to no cost for governments, so it can be a cost-effective motivator.

Information for consumers is a key component - In California, Assembly Bill 1400  required that "builders constructing new for-sale residential units to provide a 'checklist' of universal accessibility features to potential purchasers of a home."  However, if consumers don't understand the options or the benefits, then they won't demand them in great numbers. Educational campaigns and efforts from AARP and others help to educate consumers and opinion leaders about the benefits of designing housing that works for all.

In our surveys, focus groups and other research, I've learned that many people (and policymakers) don't prepare for the possibility of developing physical difficulties unless they have one or live with someone that has one. Many homeowners seem to buy homes that fit their families at a certain time and then are forced to adapt to homes that don't work for them later.  Universal Design and related concepts can provide homes that are better able to meet the needs of individuals and an aging society in the long run. For this reason, I hope that the attendees at #UDS5 had a successful event and are inspired to find new ways to make homes work better for all people.

What do you think about universal design?  Share by leaving a comment below or @DrUrbanPolicy. 

Comments

  1. Thanks again and looking forward for your post on making more. This looks like a great resource. I'm very interesting to read your blog. Thanks for posting this.


    check out here: Discovery Holidays

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Efficiency and Affordability: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

I haven't been posting often lately, as things have been pretty hectic.   I did receive a question the other day about  topic that I haven't spoken about here:  Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and it inspired me to write a quick post.  These are sometimes known as "accessory apartments," "mother-in-law suites" or "granny flats" - they are ways to provide more housing options in existing neighborhoods by allowing homeowners to build additional units on their lots.  ADU is a catch-all term for all of these situations - either units attached to existing homes or placed somewhere else on the property, say over a garage or a stand-alone in the backyard. 

They are part of the range of housing options that help to ensure that people of all ages, including older adults, can meet their needs.  AARP's model ordinance on ADUs was written by staff at the American Planning Association and was an attempt to find a set of regulations that would meet livabili…

Tales from a Condominium Association: Caps on renters and the dynamics of decision-making

As some of you know, aside from my day job developing policy and research, I am also a president of a homeowners association - specifically a multi-building condominium association.  I've been on the board for years, and I enjoy the fact that it keeps me honest - although I am looking at the wide national policy lens in the daytime, I have to face the day-to-day realities of the smallest local government in the evenings.  While I am the lead author of AARP's policy on housing issues and I am responsible for the policy direction of the American Planning Association's Planning and the Black Community Division, I am also heading up a homeowners association in an area that's been hit hard by the Great Recession.  That means that I need to think at the 30,000 foot level, but I have to keep a foot on the ground at the same time.

The latest example of this was Monday night (thanks to my TiVo, I didn't have to miss the call heard 'round the world by the replacement ref…

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girlsmeans that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing.”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers.
For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.  
The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage appears to be holding steady, the number of golden…