It was frustrating to read about the “right” housing affordability strategy in the Washington Post today . The article positioned those who support affordability through increasing overall housing supply on one side against those who support government policies to address housing on the other. Your first reaction may be, “Why can't both approaches be part of the solution?” If so, you are absolutely right. It is 2026 and we need complex solutions to our pressing societal challenges, including the cost of living, and the biggest expens for most families: housing costs. Arguing against an approach because it doesn't immediately solve all challenges when described in its simplest form is not only frustrating but potentially misleading. Also, the belief that there is one magical solution that will simply and quickly solve all the housing challenges we face is equivalent to the snake-oil salesperson from centuries ago - not the modern solutions we need today. Placing c...
The recent Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College has sparked great discourse in the week since the decision, and in particular, fear amongst those who worry about losing a key tool to fight the legacy of discrimination and the continuing disadvantages that impact people of color in the US. In its decision, the Court’s majority ruled that admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. While a range of others, including Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, have laid out dissents and critiques of the decision, I have seen little discussion of the path forward for those who seek to ensure that more people from families and communities that have been impacted by racial prejudice over the nation’s history can benefit from a college education in the future. You will read a different perspective here, building from experiences at four diffe...