Skip to main content

A Transit-Oriented Hospital as a Community Anchor

Here is a development situation that is unfolding in real time: Dimensions Healthcare System, Prince George’s County, Md officials and the University of Maryland Medical System are meeting on Thursday to discuss the location of the new regional hospital that will replace the problematic Prince George’s Hospital Center. There are four prospective sites, all in the central area of the county near interchanges on I-495, the Capital Beltway. County officials' shortsightedness may cause the hospital to be built in a location that seems optimal at a glance, but won't serve residents best - this is a perfect opportunity to use a hospital as an anchor for transit-oriented development.

Much of the attention has gone to the former Landover Mall site, currently a sea of asphalt and home to a  Sears department store - the only survivor of a shopping mall that failed in the last decade. It's just inside the beltway, more than a mile from the closest Metro station, and not far from another prospective site, the Woodmore Town Center.  There one would find a new shopping center, home to an upscale grocery store and many open lots. The third site is near the Morgan Boulevard Metro, inside the beltway and between an area with light industrial uses and a new housing development.  The fourth is my preferred choice, in the Largo Town Center Metro Station area, an outside-the-beltway location, next to another, slightly older outdoor mall, near under-utilized commercial parks, and across from townhouses, condominiums and apartments.

A view of part of the site from Lottsford Road.
(Largo Town Center Metro Station is to the right)

In this part of the county, the beltway generally serves as a dividing line between the older, more developed sections "inside the beltway" and the higher-income areas "outside the beltway." Perceptions of crime also generally lessen as one moves east, away from Southeast Washington, DC. A closed-off traditionally suburban-style campus in Landover with most access by automobile/bus and limited pedestrian traffic is a likely scenario - safety concerns and distance from Metro would weigh on the minds of developers. Development in Prince George's has historically lagged behind the other counties in the region, and the county's station areas lack the kinds of transit-oriented development seen around urban and suburban metro stations elsewhere in the region. (See my earlier essay on some of the reasons why).  This history is more than just a problem - it provides an opportunity.

 An AARP/Streetfilms video that we did highlighting equitable TOD success in Arlington County, Va. We did not find a similar location in Prince George's County, Md.

It has been nearly a decade since the Metro station in Largo has been built, and the lack of development adjacent to the station has disappointed residents. They have watched the Boulevard at the Capital Centre (the outdoor mall) fail to meet its potential, in part due to the lack of development elsewhere in the station area. The perfect tenant for the site would be a large employer to maximize the millions of dollars that were spent expanding the Metro, and a $650 million hospital center not only fits that criteria, but putting it in a location that fails to maximize the positive impact of the investment would be a waste. Most of the other sites under consideration are far from Metro, which would replicate a key problem that plagues the current hospital center in Cheverly: patients, visitors and staff without car have a difficult time accessing the facility. From a real estate perspective, the best chance of getting hospital staff to live in the community around the hospital is by building it in an outside the beltway location where the neighborhoods are generally safer. Locating this station at any of the other sites would be wasting a key opportunity to move forward. Taking advantage of the opportunity means creating a hospital that best achieves smart growth principles.

As a homeowner, the president of a community association in the neighborhood, a researcher on transit-oriented development (see my AARP Public Policy Institute report on housing near transit), and the author of a dissertation that includes Largo as a case study (see chapter 4), I have multiple perspectives on the location, and all of that research and experience leads me to prefer this site.  In conversations with other homeowners and and community leaders, I've found that enthusiasm is not just for any hospital center, but one that:

  • complements the character of the neighborhood
  • includes mixed-use development with neighborhood-scale retail,
  • includes well-designed, accessible public space that serves the hospital and the neighborhood, 
  • encourages staff to live nearby and walk to work and to use transit, and
  • minimizes emergency traffic on neighborhood streets. 
They also expect that a new major employer would have a positive impact on the existing retail and commercial development in the area.

Hospital planners should take the advantages of an outer-beltway, Metro accessible location into account: it would be part of a transit and commercial hub in the center of the county and would lack the stigma of an inner-beltway location that may impact some people's perception of the hospital before it opens its doors. Designers should create an asset that both current and future residents can utilize.

Existing residents are not asking for something unheard of: George Washington University Hospital in DC is the closest example, but our friends at the Coalition for Smarter Growth put together ten other design examples of hospitals where this has been done. Prince George’s should no longer be behind the curve: they should build the right hospital in the right location - the Largo Metro Station Area. They could build it elsewhere, but why not make the right decision this time?

Update 3/1/13 - The hearing was last night - see my reaction post with a few personal reflections here:  "Reflections on A Transit-Oriented Hospital"

 Do you have an opinion about where this hospital should be located?  Like DrUrbanPolicy on Facebook and follow on Twitter, then share your thoughts on those sites or below. 

As a reminder, these are my thoughts only and do not necessarily represent the positions of any organization. The views, opinions and judgments expressed are solely my own. This essay has not been reviewed or approved by AARP or any of the Largo community associations.


Popular posts from this blog

Removing Woodrow Wilson's Name from Princeton: Looking Back to Move Forward

I applaud the Princeton University Board of Trustees' decision yesterday to remove the name of Woodrow Wilson from the policy school and residential college that were formerly named for him. While this decision may appear sudden to some, the Board has carefully deliberated on this decision over a number  of years. For alumni like myself, the school's reputation as a place of a world-class education in public policy has long been at odds with the mixed legacy of its eponym. As the board states, "Wilson’s racist thinking and policies make him an inappropriate namesake for a school whose scholars, students, and alumni must be firmly committed to combating the scourge of racism in all its forms."

Over the years, alumni have expressed varying levels of pride, discomfort and shame over the decision to continue this honor of having one of the nation's foremost policy schools named after Wilson.  He was the president of the university, a governor of the state and Preside…

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girlsmeans that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing.”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers.
For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.  
The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage appears to be holding steady, the number of golden…

Efficiency and Affordability: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

I haven't been posting often lately, as things have been pretty hectic.   I did receive a question the other day about  topic that I haven't spoken about here:  Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and it inspired me to write a quick post.  These are sometimes known as "accessory apartments," "mother-in-law suites" or "granny flats" - they are ways to provide more housing options in existing neighborhoods by allowing homeowners to build additional units on their lots.  ADU is a catch-all term for all of these situations - either units attached to existing homes or placed somewhere else on the property, say over a garage or a stand-alone in the backyard. 

They are part of the range of housing options that help to ensure that people of all ages, including older adults, can meet their needs.  AARP's model ordinance on ADUs was written by staff at the American Planning Association and was an attempt to find a set of regulations that would meet livabili…